Thursday, November 7, 2013

Social Deconstruction of Wolves Part 2

Art
The portrayal of wolves in art has changed throughout history, much the same as human attitudes towards them. Early portrayals of wolves mirror early cultures' association of wolves with death and violence. A good example of this is medieval artwork involving wolves. Wolves were often hunted in medieval times for their pelts and to protect livestock. There are many depictions of this in medieval artwork. These came in the form of paintings, tapestries, and woodcut prints. 
In the picture (left), men can be seen riding horses chasing a wolf. A common element in these medieval depiction is the use of dogs in the hunt. This demonstrates the irony of humans using the descendants of wolves to hunt wolves themselves. The number of people pictured also imply a more group oriented activity, done for sport more than out of necessity.
More modern depictions of wolf art seem to be more of an attempt to capture their natural beauty. Many paintings portray them in a natural setting, often howling at the moon. One example of this is the infamous “Three Wolf Moon” picture.
 The design, appropriately, shows three wolves howling at the moon. This image became so popular that not only has it been put on a top selling shirt, but it has been featured in pop culture on television shows such as “The Office” and “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia”.

Literature and Folklore
The most common depiction of wolves in folklore seems to be the trope of the big bad wolf. Aesop’s Fables, and Grimm’s Fairy Tales are two sets of works that make heavy use of this character. There are many pieces of folklore that portray wolves in a negative light, "The Wolf and the Lamb", "The Wolf and the Seven Young Kids", "Three Little Pigs", and possibly the most famous "Little Red Riding Hood". The classic story tells the tale of a young girl traveling through the woods on the way to her grandmother’s house. On her way she meets a wolf who she naïvely tells where she is going. The wolf makes it to her grandmother’s house first and eats her. When little red riding hood arrives, she is fooled by the wolf disguising himself  as her grandmother. By the time she realizes it is the wolf, he swallows her whole. Luckily a hunter arrives and cuts the wolf in half, freeing Red Riding Hood and her grandmother and killing the wolf.
A major message of this story seems to be to highlight the danger of the woods. And what better way to show danger than through the use of a wolf? Wolves in this culture were viewed as dangerous and sneaky, often stealing livestock from human farms. Although many classical tales tell stories about the big bad wolf, little red riding hood is perhaps the most well known. Also unlike many other stories such as Three Little Pigs and The Wolf and the Lamb, the story of Little Red Riding Hood tells the story of  a human being victimized by a wolf. This allows children to feel a stronger connection with her as a character and serves as more of a cautionary tale to them than one that involves pigs or goats being eaten. The fear of wolves contributes to the creation of this fairy tale, and in exchange it itself breeds more fear.

Film
"Balto" is an animated movie from 1995 that depicts the semi-historical tale of Balto, a wolfdog in Nome, Alaska. In the film, many children in Nome contract diphtheria, and poor weather conditions prevent delivery of medicine by anything other than train, the nearest station for which is in Nenana. After the original sled dog team sent to retrieve the medicine does not return, Balto sets out to find them. He manages to find the team and using his keen wolf senses, manages to guide them back to Nome in time.

"The Grey" is a 2011 film starring Liam Neeson that tells the story of a group of oilmen stranded in Alaska after their plane crashes. They proceed to spend the rest of the movie trying to make their way to safety as they are being hunted by a pack of gray wolves. The wolves kill off the team members one by one until eventually Liam Neeson’s character is the last one remaining. He find his way into the wolves’ den and ends up fighting the alpha wolf. The ending is left ambiguous as to whether or not Neeson dies fighting the wolf.




These movies show a very different attitude about wolves. And this is likely due to their target audiences. Balto is aimed at children. Its story is more intended to teach kids a lesson about how to (or not to) treat others who are different. The fact that Balto is half-wolf is still important  as the humans fear him because they perceive him as dangerous. This gives the movie a secondary message that wolves are not inherently dangerous, but instead are misunderstood. The movie also makes use of a full wolf (albeit a possible spirit wolf) that comes to Balto in his time of need to help him get back to safety.

Meanwhile, "The Grey" is aimed at adults and makes wolves out to be dangerous killers. The wolves in the movie have seemingly no reason to hunt and track the characters. The only reason given comes after the team kills a lower ranking wolf supposedly sent by the alpha male to test them. One of the squad members cuts off its head and throws it back at the pack. The others think this is a bad idea and say that wolves are the only other creatures known to take revenge.


Not only is this portrayal harmful to human perception of wolves, by making them out to be senseless killing machines, it is also blatantly false. Wolves do not stalk humans, in fact they tend to avoid humans when possible.  Wolves also do not seek revenge. Not only that, if they did they would still not be the only animals to do it as animals as diverse as chimps, cuttlefish, Tigers, and other big cats show grudge behavior.
Balto chose to tell the story of a wolfdog although the original dog the story was based on was a Siberian Husky. This choice may have been purely to add a subplot about racial discrimination to add to the story. "The Grey" on the other hand seems to have chosen wolves purely because they can be made frightening. The same story could have been told with bears or some other predator. Wolves were likely chosen because of their pack hunting behavior which makes it easier to have them out smart or out maneuver the human characters.

Mythology
In Norse mythology, the most major wolf is Fenrir, who was birthed from the trickster god Loki. Fenrir is described as a monstrous wolf, massive in size and incredibly vicious. Fenrir seems to be intended as a frightening figure. He is so dangerous that he must be bound. In Gylfaginning, the war god Tyr places his hand in the wolf’s mouth as a show of good faith to the wolf. It is at this time that the other gods bind Fenrir with an unbreakable chain forged by dwarves. In retaliation to the treachery, Fenrir bites of Tyr’s hand.

Fenrir also has two sons. Sköll chases the horses that pull the chariot containing the sun, and Hati, who chases the moon. These two keep the cycle of night and day until Ragnarok when they will finally succeed in catching the sun and moon.  


Another important part of Fenrir’s myth is his role in the apocalypse, Ragnarok when he will fight and kill Odin, father of the gods.
Both of these legends give the picture of wolves as fearsome hunters. There are even stories of wolves being ridden by witches and giantesses, dangerous humanoids whose association with the animals may have been meant to make them seem more formidable.
Norse portrayals of wolves are not all negative however. Odin himself is said to have two faithful wolf pets Geri and Freki who are described as being of good omen. Odin treats these wolves generously, even feeding them food from his table as he himself only requires wine as food and drink.


These myths about wolves seem to intend caution. Although the wolves are seen as fearsome and, in the case of Fenrir, dangerous, Odin’s keeping of them as pets still brings them some amount of respect. The Nords were a people who valued strength. Many of their myths about their gods tell stories about contests of strength and battles. It is for these reasons that they seem to respect wolves for the formidability and treat them with caution rather than fear.

Contoversy
Although hunting of wolves was a very common practice thousands of years ago, today it has become a much more controversial subject. One side argues that it is essential management of wolf numbers, whereas the other side argues that it is harmful to the environment.
        
    Alaska currently has laws allowing for the legal hunting of wolves during the proper season. This is in an effort to control their numbers and keep them at a sustainable level. Wolf populations typically experience 20-40% mortality due to natural deaths and annual harvest without experience a year to year decline in numbers. There is also an ulterior motive to increase the number of surviving moose and caribou.
            Not all is well with these programs however. There are some scientists that argue that the artificial inflation of moose and caribou populations could lead to habitat destruction and ultimately a decline in those populations.
            A larger issue arose in 2007, when Gov. Palin approved the shooting of wolves and bears while flying, claiming that it was for protection of property. This drew fire from members of Congress, who drafted legislation entitled the Protect America’s Wildlife (PAW) Act, which intended to close the loophole allowing aerial management of wildlife. This bill was never enacted.
            A major argument against hunting wolves is that they work in tandem with wildlife managers. They cull the numbers of game species and kill off unhealthy individuals, raising the overall health of the herd. Without wolves, it is argued that prey numbers would grow to unsustainable levels and severe damage would be done to the ecosystem.
            Supporters of wolf hunting claim that wolf populations have a negative effect on game herds and blame them for dramatic drops in prey populations. One example of this is the drop of southern Alaskan caribou populations from 10,000 in 1983 to about 600 in 2008.
            I believe that the management of wolves is much like the management of any other wild life species. We must first analyze the trends of the existing populations and determine human effects on them. In the event that hunting has to occur to help recover another species numbers, we must take the time to accurately determine a safe number that can be culled without upsetting the balance even further. I do not agree with killing wolves to artificially increase the numbers of species like caribou and moose so that those species can be hunted. I believe that hunting in and of itself should only be used for management purposes and so artificially inflating a species’ numbers, just so you can cull them again seems inhumane and cruel.

Resources
Griffin, Emma (2007). Blood Sport: Hunting in Britain Since 1066. p. 296. ISBN 0300116284.
Orchard, Andy (1997). Dictionary of Norse Myth and Legend. Cassell. ISBN 0-304-34520-2
Guerber, Hélène Adeline (1992) [1909]. "Odin's Personal Appearance, Greek and Northern Mythologies". Myths of the Norsemen: from the eddas and the sagas (Dover ed.). Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. pp. 17, 347. ISBN 0-486-27348-2. "At his feet crouched two wolves or hunting hounds, Geri and Freki, animals therefore sacred to him, and of good omen if met by the way. Odin always fed these wolves with his own hands from meat set before him."
Pliny the Elder. "viii". Historia Naturalis. p. 81. 22/34
Taylor, Matt (2008-09-02). "FAHA Synopsis". Slate.com. Retrieved 2012-06-21.